![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Hey, guys. Just a quick reminder that tomorrow, January 31st, 2012, is your last chance to obtain a Chicon 7 supporting membership with full Hugo nomination and voting rights. You will be able to obtain a voting membership after this, but you won't have the opportunity to nominate. You can find details here, on the Chicon 7 website. Supporting memberships are $50 USD.
Why is this a good deal?
$50 is a lot of money, right? So why is this a good deal? Two reasons, really.
Everybody likes books.
The Hugo Awards now come with an electronic voting packet that contains all the nominated fiction, and a lot of the nominated non-fiction. So that's between four and six novels good enough to make the ballot, four and six novellas, novelettes, short stories...it's like a giant Kinderegg of fictional goodness. No matter how you cut it, $50 for that much reading material is a pretty damn good deal, and that's just the fiction. It's a great way to see what the community considered worthy of recognition in any given year, like a really super-sized version of the Hugo nominee anthologies I used to read when I was a kid.
Be part of the process.
The Hugos are nominated, and voted, by a relatively small percentage of the overall community, and every year, people complain about how the winners aren't their choices. Okay. So change it. By putting in a nominating ballot, you shape the final ballot. By voting, you shape the winners. If we want this award to represent our whole community, we need to participate.
It has never been easier to read all the nominated material. It has never been easier to be a part of the process. If you want the Hugos to reflect the material you believe should be winning, you need to participate.
$50 ain't cheap. But what you get for it isn't cheap, either. You get books; you get a voice; and you get to shape what our community recognizes.
It's pretty damn cool.
Why is this a good deal?
$50 is a lot of money, right? So why is this a good deal? Two reasons, really.
Everybody likes books.
The Hugo Awards now come with an electronic voting packet that contains all the nominated fiction, and a lot of the nominated non-fiction. So that's between four and six novels good enough to make the ballot, four and six novellas, novelettes, short stories...it's like a giant Kinderegg of fictional goodness. No matter how you cut it, $50 for that much reading material is a pretty damn good deal, and that's just the fiction. It's a great way to see what the community considered worthy of recognition in any given year, like a really super-sized version of the Hugo nominee anthologies I used to read when I was a kid.
Be part of the process.
The Hugos are nominated, and voted, by a relatively small percentage of the overall community, and every year, people complain about how the winners aren't their choices. Okay. So change it. By putting in a nominating ballot, you shape the final ballot. By voting, you shape the winners. If we want this award to represent our whole community, we need to participate.
It has never been easier to read all the nominated material. It has never been easier to be a part of the process. If you want the Hugos to reflect the material you believe should be winning, you need to participate.
$50 ain't cheap. But what you get for it isn't cheap, either. You get books; you get a voice; and you get to shape what our community recognizes.
It's pretty damn cool.
no subject
Date: 2012-01-30 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-30 09:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-30 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-31 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-31 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-01 01:36 am (UTC)Also, as you said, not pissing off the voting pool is a good thing.
A slightly ranty sidebar: Of course, I also just bought a nook book that was supposedly a drm free epub (so it could have been read on my sony, no problem), but which can't even be read on the nook app on a pc without wanting the credit card it was bought with on file, so I'm a bit touchy on the subject of drm. I paid them, I am jumping through their hoops, and they want to make sure that i not only paid for it, but that I can pay for it again?
Another sidebar, minus the annoyed: Lilly is so beautiful. <3
no subject
Date: 2012-02-01 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-30 09:31 pm (UTC)And I will re-post the following:
So given that you have so many eligible items I have created a few doodles so those who can nominate can coordinate if they wish to so that we don't all nominate different works and none have a chance of being on the list. Please ignore this if you find it distasteful :)
Best Novel:
http://www.doodle.com/3xav2v6tgw9bp7cu
Best Short Story.
http://www.doodle.com/pe667ggxzq4wtfa7
no subject
Date: 2012-01-31 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-30 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-31 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-31 01:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-31 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-31 01:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-31 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-31 07:31 am (UTC)$50 for the chance to nominate & then vote is a pretty great deal - last year I "discovered" both Connie Willis & Lois McMaster Bujold because of it (not slow on the uptake at all, no sirree... ;) )
I like the chance to have a say in what is nominated & who wins, at least in the categories I know something about (or can inform myself by watching / reading).
no subject
Date: 2012-01-31 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-01-31 06:13 pm (UTC):D
no subject
Date: 2012-01-31 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-01 04:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-01 05:10 pm (UTC)